Standard Post with Image

The NHAI Counsel Agreed to Abide By Any Order Passed By The

  • However, the Registrar (Administration) of the High Court contested the petitioner's plea on the ground that the High Court's Building Committee had already rejected her request. The Judge said, "It is clear that what stands between the petitioner and her land today is neither the State government nor the NHAI, but the Registrar of this court and that too on the basis of a report of the building committee. But the objection of the Registrar is not well founded. "The petitioner has already submitted herself to acquisition proceedings, first at the instance of the State government for the formation of this court and next at the instance of NHAI for the expansion of the four-lane highway. The provision for the petitioner to have access to the unacquired portion of her land should have been made by the NHAI voluntarily.

  • "Neither the State government nor NHAI nor even this court has any right to prevent the petitioner from having free access to her land. Putting up a barricade is actually an infringement of the petitioner's right to property which is held to be both a constitutional right under Article 300-A and a human right".

Source